As a Christian, I often approach television adaptations of biblical stories with a mix of excitement and caution. The Bible is a sacred text, rich with history, theology, and divine truth, so any attempt to bring its narratives to the screen must be handled with care. Amazon Prime Video’s House of David, a new series chronicling the early life of King David, has caught my attention. Having watched roughly half of the first season, I’m eager to share my thoughts on how closely it aligns with the biblical account, its strengths as a production, and where it takes creative liberties. I hope to give you my thoughts, encouraging discernment while appreciating the show’s efforts to bring Scripture to life.

A Faithful Foundation with Creative Flourishes
House of David centres on the early years of David, the shepherd boy who becomes Israel’s greatest king, with the first season building towards his iconic confrontation with Goliath. The show draws primarily from 1 Samuel 13–18, faithfully depicting key moments such as Samuel’s anointing of David and David’s role as a harpist in King Saul’s court. The prophet Samuel, portrayed by Stephen Lang, is a commanding presence, embodying the gravitas of a God-ordained seer. King Saul (Ali Suliman) and other biblical figures, like Jonathan and Michal, are all present, grounding the narrative in the scriptural framework. For those familiar with David’s life as depicted in the Bible, the core story is recognisable, and the show strives to honour the essence of these events.
However, the Bible provides sparse details about David’s early life, leaving gaps that House of David fills with creative storytelling. This poetic licence is understandable—television demands a fleshed-out narrative to sustain an eight-episode season. For example, the show introduces subplots, such as a fictional romance between David and Michal that unfolds earlier than in Scripture, and explores David’s family dynamics, including a tradition suggesting he was an outcast due to his birth circumstances. While these additions add drama, they occasionally stray from the biblical text. The David of Scripture is marked by unwavering faith and courage, but the show sometimes portrays him as rebellious or uncertain, which feels inconsistent with his biblical character. As long as these embellishments don’t contradict the Bible’s core truths, I find them generally acceptable for a dramatic adaptation, though they require discernment.
I found some of the shows portrayal of David a little inconsistent at times. Even as a young man, watching the flocks, my impression from the Bible is that he had unwavering courage. The show often depicts him as quite fearful, and although he faces those fears Even tackling a lion, the show does not depict him as the man I imagine from reading the Bible. I am the 1st to admit that could be my problem, and perhaps there is some realism in a younger David learning to face his fears and develop courage as he matures. But it’s something to look out for and consider. 
Strengths: Engaging Storytelling and High Production Value
One of the standout qualities of House of David is its production quality. Filmed in Greece, the series boasts stunning cinematography, with sweeping landscapes and detailed sets that immerse viewers in the ancient Near Eastern world. The costumes and battle scenes are meticulously crafted, lending authenticity to the period. The acting is another strength—Michael Iskander’s portrayal of David captures his musicality and heart, even if the character occasionally deviates from the biblical archetype. Ali Suliman’s Saul is particularly compelling, portraying a king torn between divine calling and personal pride, a dynamic that mirrors 1 Samuel 15’s account of his disobedience.
The show’s pacing is steady, allowing relationships—such as David’s friendship with Jonathan or his tensions with Saul—to develop naturally. It explores themes of faith, obedience, and destiny, which resonate deeply with Christian viewers. The inclusion of David’s love for music, with Hebrew psalms woven into the narrative, adds a spiritually rich layer, reminding us of his role as the “sweet psalmist of Israel”.
Areas of Concern: Darkness and Supernatural Elements
House of David doesn’t shy away from the grittier aspects of the biblical world. The battle scenes, while not gratuitous, are reasonably violent, reflecting the harsh realities of the time. This aligns with the historical context but may be intense for younger viewers, so parental discretion is advised.
More concerning is the show’s emphasis on witchcraft and supernatural elements, particularly among Israel’s enemies. For instance, a subplot involving the Amalekite king Agag casting spells and references to giants as descendants of fallen angels lean heavily into fantasy. While these elements draw from biblical and postbiblical traditions, they risk sensationalising the narrative, making it feel more like a fantasy epic than a historical drama. The Bible mentions spiritual forces, but House of David amplifies these, sometimes veering into speculative territory, such as an early meeting with the Witch of Endor, which is entirely fabricated.
Clearly the Bible is a supernatural book. There are many references to God in the show, and we know from the biblical text that the enemies of Israel did worship false idols and have detestable practices which led to God‘s judgement on them. So I’m not criticising the show for supernatural elements, Merely pointing out that we ought to handle this material with care. 
A Reminder to Return to Scripture
I haven’t watched The Chosen, a series often compared to House of David for its biblical storytelling, but I assume it shares a similar approach: blending scriptural fidelity with dramatic interpretation. House of David is an engaging watch, and I’m eager to finish the season. Its success—reaching #2 on Prime Video’s most-watched list and drawing 22 million viewers in its first 17 days—shows its broad appeal. However, as Christians, we must use such adaptations as a springboard, not a substitute, for studying the Bible. Shows like this can spark interest in Scripture, but they also remind us to verify what we see against the Word of God.
In conclusion, House of David is a visually stunning, well-acted series that largely captures the spirit of David’s early life, though it takes notable creative liberties. It’s a compelling blend of faith and drama, but its darker themes and supernatural flourishes require discernment. I encourage viewers to enjoy it as historical fiction while returning to 1 Samuel to anchor their understanding in truth. Let’s use this series to deepen our engagement with the Bible, ensuring we know what is—and isn’t—biblical.
- Counting the Cost of Comfort (Matthew 8:19-20)
- A Determined Desire: Choosing a Life of Integrity (Psalm 101:2)
- A Heart Captivated: The Foundation of a Godly Life (Psalm 101:1)
- The Richness Within: Christ, Chorus and Christian Community (Colossians 3:16)
- The Sovereign’s Vow (Introduction to Psalm 101)